Decode probable production dates, compare runs, browse photographic evidence and help build a better dataset across Ex Nihilo fragrances.
Reported → Photo verified → Confirmed, based on independent evidence.
Optional longevity and projection data can be attached to each piece of evidence.
Records are scored based on photo, source, purchase details, confirmations and moderation.
| Fragrance | Batch | Date | X | Confidence | Quality | Evidence | Performance |
|---|
Current, archived, special-edition and researched regional exclusives. A fragrance can appear here even when no batch has been documented yet.
Automatic analysis of the current dataset. These are research signals, not manufacturer-confirmed rules.
Compare alternative interpretations against the observed dataset. Scores are heuristic research-fit indicators, not official validation.
Latest batch observations are separated from unresolved leads and conflicts. A code can be useful research evidence without being treated as manufacturer-confirmed.
Photo leads, owner leads, retailer leads and conflicting identifiers stay visible until the batch can be read and independently checked.
| Fragrance | Lead | Code / prefix | Size | Priority | Research note |
|---|
This page tracks which product prefixes have actually been observed and how strong the evidence is. Prefixes are not inferred from fragrance names unless evidence exists.
| Fragrance | Prefix | Status | Evidence | Collection | Action |
|---|
Choose a fragrance to visualize its known production-code sequence and batch families.
Best submissions include: a clear batch photo, correct fragrance/concentration, bottle size, approximate purchase period, country and public source.